There is a popular
saying in British politics which asserts the need for a crisis to pre-empt any
change. This seemed to true after
Iceland’s 2 - 1 defeat of England on the 27th June; in the immediate
aftermath of the game their coaching team, led by Roy Hodgson, resigned with
immediate effect which was followed by a myriad of reasons for the team’s
demise the following day in the associated press. There was an article in the Daily Mail
written by a prominent ex-player turned pundit admonishing the environment
within professional academies stating that it was too easy for young players
since the passing of traditional apprenticeship schemes requiring young players
to sweep the stadium and clean professional players boots; modern players it
seems are too soft (http://goo.gl/1MfNhD).
Criticism was also levelled at the standard of coaching in an article
published in The Times (http://goo.gl/MX7gOQ). Whilst
there may (or may not depending on your viewpoint) be elements of truth in
these articles they do not discriminate between successful and unsuccessful
teams – it is likely that there are poor coaches and relatively sanitised
academies in teams that performed well at this summer’s European
Championships. Indeed, the vast majority
of the hugely successful Wales team will have come through systems similar if
not the same to the England players.
Two weeks on and the
furore has subsided. Other than some
cursory comments from commentators who really should be concentrating on teams
still in the tournament, there has been little media attention. Most of the clubs from which the England
squad were selected, along with many others, will have already started their
pre-season preparations, likely with no change to plans established prior to
England’s exit. The truth is that within
the club system there really is no crisis; most (if not all in the Premier League
from where the squad were selected, more on this later) have successful
academies that have produced professional players, if not for the parent club
then another in the league structure and thanks to the Elite Player Performance
Programme (EPPP) receive substantial financial support from the Premier
League. Furthermore, an announcement was
made this week that a number of professional academy teams would be competing
in the EFL trophy (formerly Johnston Paint) providing young players with a more
competitive format to ply their trade (although the senior league teams may not
agree) in the season 2016/2017.
Within football (the
UK at least) there is a discord between the success of the domestic league and
its national team for which there is no easy solution, despite knee jerk
commentaries issued by the media following a disappointment in a major
competition. There may be a huge number
of eligible players who do not get the opportunity to play in a league that
showcases their ability but who have been successful in the age group system at
national level. England 21’s were
successful in their tournament campaign this summer. This may be because of overseas players or
more experienced domestic players being picked ahead of them; this is a
detrimental outcome of having such a thriving and financially strong domestic
league, very few in the Premier League would want to see this challenged on the
premise that it might strengthen the national team I suspect. Rugby Union seemed to have navigated this
issue well with centralised contracts for international players however it is
difficult to see a situation when football may follow suit, especially if, like
in Rugby Union, players are removed from their clubs for extended periods.
As far as
discriminating factors are concerned the one striking factor is the lack of
diversity amongst the England team in terms of competitive leagues from which players
were selected from. Moreover, when you consider the home nation teams within
the tournament, only Wales and ROI selected players playing in overseas
competitions and only one in each instance, Gareth Bale and Robbie Keane. England selected their entire squad from the
Premier League. This is in stark
contrast to the other teams contesting the semi-finals; Germany, France, Portugal
were all made up of players selected from a host of leagues around Europe. This broad range of experiences in terms of
playing style and tactics may be an important factor at major competitions;
however how the home nations achieve this (should they see value in it) when
lucrative contracts are available for young players at their parent clubs is
hard to imagine.
No comments:
Post a Comment